<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters may be sufficient for privity for malpractice action.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jodielhill.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/</link>
	<description>a legal blog for Arkansas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privity setting &#124; Kiibouyanrunlun7</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Privity setting &#124; Kiibouyanrunlun7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters   Filed in Uncategorized    « George mart [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters   Filed in Uncategorized    « George mart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters may be sufficient for privity for malpractice action. &#124; dating-service</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters may be sufficient for privity for malpractice action. &#124; dating-service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-advice-regarding-legal-matters-may-be-sufficient-for-privity-for-malpractice-action/#comment-232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] See the rest here: Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters may be sufficient for privity fo... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here: Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that advice regarding legal matters may be sufficient for privity fo&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

