<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arkansas Supreme Court holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jodielhill.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/</link>
	<description>a legal blog for Arkansas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Failure to Sign Complaint Does Not Render Service of Process Defective &#171; ArkansasAppeals.com</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Failure to Sign Complaint Does Not Render Service of Process Defective &#171; ArkansasAppeals.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] does not render service of process defective.  For more analysis of this decision, visit the Downtown Lawyer legal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does not render service of process defective.  For more analysis of this decision, visit the Downtown Lawyer legal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uberVU - social comments]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by downtownlawyer: Ark SC holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned http://bit.ly/19j8UI...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by downtownlawyer: Ark SC holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned <a href="http://bit.ly/19j8UI.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/19j8UI..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Arkansas Supreme Court holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned. « Downtown Lawyer -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Arkansas Supreme Court holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned. « Downtown Lawyer -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/arkansas-supreme-court-holds-that-service-of-process-of-a-complaint-is-not-invalid-merely-because-it-is-unsigned/#comment-248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jodie L. Hill and Jeff Bannister, Jeff Karotkin. Jeff Karotkin said: RT @downtownlawyer Ark SC holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned http://bit.ly/19j8UI [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jodie L. Hill and Jeff Bannister, Jeff Karotkin. Jeff Karotkin said: RT @downtownlawyer Ark SC holds that service of process of a complaint is not invalid merely because it is unsigned <a href="http://bit.ly/19j8UI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/19j8UI</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

