<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Downtown Lawyer &#187; Eleventh Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jodielhill.com/category/constitutional-law/eleventh-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jodielhill.com</link>
	<description>a legal blog for Arkansas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='jodielhill.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://jodielhill.com/osd.xml" title="Downtown Lawyer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://jodielhill.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth Circuit holds that, by joining litigation as a plaintiff, State of Missouri waived its sovereign immunity.</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2009/08/12/eighth-circuit-holds-that-by-joining-litigation-as-a-plaintiff-state-of-missouri-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/</link>
		<comments>http://jodielhill.com/2009/08/12/eighth-circuit-holds-that-by-joining-litigation-as-a-plaintiff-state-of-missouri-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jodie L. Hill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eleventh Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign immunity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/eighth-circuit-holds-that-by-joining-litigation-as-a-plaintiff-state-of-missouri-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, No. 08-3399. Under the Clean Water Act, when the federal government brings a civil action against a municipality, the state in which the municipality is located must also be joined as a party.  This requirement exists because that state is liable for any judgment against the municipality to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jodielhill.com&amp;blog=5697780&amp;post=387&amp;subd=downtownlawyer&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>U.S. v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District</em>, <a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/08/083399P.pdf" target="_blank">No. 08-3399</a>.</p>
<p>Under the Clean Water Act, when the federal government brings a civil action against a municipality, the state in which the municipality is located must also be joined as a party.  This requirement exists because that state is liable for any judgment against the municipality to the extent the municipality cannot raise revenue to pay the judgment because of state law.</p>
<p>The federal government intended to bring suit against the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (&#8220;district&#8221;) for allegedly discharging raw sewage from its sewer system.  Because the Clean Water Act required the State of Missouri to be a party to the litigation, Missouri chose to be a plaintiff but did not bring any separate, state claims against the district.  The district then filed counterclaims against Missouri, arguing that it was entitled to indemnity under the provisions of the Clean Water Act.  Missouri moved to dismiss the counterclaims, arguing that it had sovereign immunity.  The trial court denied the motion, noting that Missouri had waived its sovereign immunity by bringing the lawsuit.</p>
<p>On appeal, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court, noting that Missouri could have easily been added as a defendant instead of a plaintiff.  The court pointed out that Missouri&#8217;s liability is unlikely to exceed the liability it already has under the above provisions of the Clean Water Act.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/387/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jodielhill.com&amp;blog=5697780&amp;post=387&amp;subd=downtownlawyer&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jodielhill.com/2009/08/12/eighth-circuit-holds-that-by-joining-litigation-as-a-plaintiff-state-of-missouri-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f8891c8d6a00931956252be435341e2b?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">downtown lawyer</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
