Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Contract Law’ Category

Highway Sales, Inc. v. Blue Bird Corp., No. 07-3225. on July 31, 2003, plaintiffs purchased a Blue Bird Wanderlodge RV.  From that date until July 2, 2004, the RV suffered from numerous problems.  The RV underwent numerous repairs, but continued experiencing difficulties.  On July 2, 2004, plaintiffs brought the RV back and sent a July [...]

Read Full Post »

L.F. Brands Marketing, Inc. v. Dillard’s, Inc., No. CA07-1210. Plaintiff sold clothing to defendant for many years under a contract that contained a merger clause.  Under the parties’ agreement, defendant could deduct markdown allowances and chargebacks from the amount owed to plaintiff.  The total of these markdown allowances and chargebacks was negotiated orally by the [...]

Read Full Post »

American Express was sued over the terms of its Blue Cash rewards program, but the case was dismissed because the credit card contracts required each member of the class to enter into arbitration with American Express individually.  On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals noted there was a question of whether state law would [...]

Read Full Post »

Spirtas Co. v. Ins. Co. of the State of Penn., No. 07-1547. Contracts A contractor entered into a $2.8 million agreement with a property owner to remove asbestos from the property.  The remediation contract contained an arbitration clause.  The property owner required the contractor to obtain a $2.8 million surety bond for the work.  The [...]

Read Full Post »

Terminix Int’l Co. v. Trivitt, No. CA 08-233 A terminated employee brought a suit against her former employer for defamation and outrage.  The employer moved to compel the case to arbitration based on the arbitration clause included in the employee’s employment contract.  The arbitration clause at issue stated that the arbitration agreement would be governed [...]

Read Full Post »

Koch v. Compucredit Corp., No. 07-1948 Plaintiff sued a group of creditors who took over collections of a defunct bank for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.  The defendant creditors moved to compel arbitration under the arbitration clause of the credit agreement, but the trial court denied [...]

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.