Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Environmental Law’ Category

The Medina County Environmental Action Association sought review of a decision by the Surface Transportation Board and the Fish and Wildlife Service allowing a rail line for a limestone quarry in Texas. Environmentalists worried about the endangered golden-cheeked warbler and invertebrates living in karst limestone formations. The transportation board granted Vulcan Construction Materials permission to [...]

Read Full Post »

Following the Second Circuit decision in Connecticut v. AEP–which reinstated federal public nuisance claims of eight states, New York City, and three land trusts against six power companies over carbon dioxide emissions—the Fifth Circuit rejected a lower court’s findings that global-warming disputes are best resolved by the political branches of government. Instead, the court held [...]

Read Full Post »

The Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act, a voter-approved ban passed in 2006, prohibits smoking in schools and workplaces, but makes exceptions for bars, casinos and strip clubs. The Nevada Tavern Owners Association, Terrible’s Hotel and Casino, and Three Angry Wives Pub challenged the criminal portion of the Act, claiming it was vague to be enforced. [...]

Read Full Post »

Izaak Walton League of Am., Inc. v. Kimbell, Nos. 07-3689/07-3696/08-1167. Congress enacted the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act (“the Act”) in 1978 to protect, enhance, and preserve the natural value of lakes, waterways, and associated forested areas.  Under the Act, the United States Forestry Service regulates the use of motorboats and snowmobiles in these [...]

Read Full Post »

After a section of the Sequoia National Forest in California was burned, the U.S. Forest Service allowed a group to salvage timber from the area.  This project was known as The Burnt Ridge Project.  Environmental organizations brought suit challenging the authority of the U.S. Forest Service for salvaged timber sales.  The lawsuit finally reached the [...]

Read Full Post »

The court held that HPI Products failed to comply with the Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, and Missouri environmental laws.  See the full story here.

Read Full Post »