<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Downtown Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jodielhill.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jodielhill.com</link>
	<description>a legal blog for Arkansas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trademark Trial &amp; Appeal Board nixes use of &#8220;the other red meat&#8221; as trademark for salmon. by Jodie L. Hill</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/07/01/trademark-trial-appeal-board-nixes-use-of-the-other-red-meat-as-trademark-for-salmon/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie L. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/trademark-trial-appeal-board-nixes-use-of-the-other-red-meat-as-trademark-for-salmon/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>Yeah...I&#039;ve gotten a lot of feedback about this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;I&#8217;ve gotten a lot of feedback about this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trademark Trial &amp; Appeal Board nixes use of &#8220;the other red meat&#8221; as trademark for salmon. by seattle criminal defense lawyer</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/07/01/trademark-trial-appeal-board-nixes-use-of-the-other-red-meat-as-trademark-for-salmon/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>seattle criminal defense lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/trademark-trial-appeal-board-nixes-use-of-the-other-red-meat-as-trademark-for-salmon/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>That sounds like a very interesting case or trademark law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like a very interesting case or trademark law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eighth Circuit refuses to apply &#8220;look through&#8221; approach to &#167;4 petitions to compel arbitration under the FAA based on diversity jurisdiction. by Eighth Circuit refuses to apply “look through” approach to §4 petitions to compel arbitration under the FAA based on diversity jurisdiction. « Downtown Lawyer &#171; Lynch at Large</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/05/17/eighth-circuit-refuses-to-apply-look-through-approach-to-4-petitions-to-compel-arbitration-under-the-faa-based-on-diversity-jurisdiction/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Eighth Circuit refuses to apply “look through” approach to §4 petitions to compel arbitration under the FAA based on diversity jurisdiction. « Downtown Lawyer &#171; Lynch at Large</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/eighth-circuit-refuses-to-apply-look-through-approach-to-4-petitions-to-compel-arbitration-under-the-faa-based-on-diversity-jurisdiction/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>[...] Eighth Circuit refuses to apply “look through” approach to §4 petitions to compel arbitration u.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eighth Circuit refuses to apply “look through” approach to §4 petitions to compel arbitration u&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Practice by Jodie L. Hill</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/my-practice/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie L. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jodielhill.com/?page_id=412#comment-603</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I could be of some help. Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I could be of some help. Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Practice by Jessica Brookings Watson</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/my-practice/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Brookings Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jodielhill.com/?page_id=412#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Hey girl, I was just cruising through FaceBook and thought I&#039;d look at your site. It was inspirational. Just when I think I&#039;m never going to find a job as an entry-level paralegal, I see that that&#039;s how you started. Good to hear. I just graduated and am trying not to get discouraged in the job hunting. I&#039;ve submitted a resume to every firm in Central Arkansas, it seems. Just wanted to say I enjoyed your bio. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey girl, I was just cruising through FaceBook and thought I&#8217;d look at your site. It was inspirational. Just when I think I&#8217;m never going to find a job as an entry-level paralegal, I see that that&#8217;s how you started. Good to hear. I just graduated and am trying not to get discouraged in the job hunting. I&#8217;ve submitted a resume to every firm in Central Arkansas, it seems. Just wanted to say I enjoyed your bio.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eighth Circuit refuses to apply &#8220;look through&#8221; approach to &#167;4 petitions to compel arbitration under the FAA based on diversity jurisdiction. by New Jersey Devils won&#8217;t change approach for Game 2 against Philadelphia Flyers &#124; NHL focus</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/05/17/eighth-circuit-refuses-to-apply-look-through-approach-to-4-petitions-to-compel-arbitration-under-the-faa-based-on-diversity-jurisdiction/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>New Jersey Devils won&#8217;t change approach for Game 2 against Philadelphia Flyers &#124; NHL focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/eighth-circuit-refuses-to-apply-look-through-approach-to-4-petitions-to-compel-arbitration-under-the-faa-based-on-diversity-jurisdiction/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>[...] Eighth Circuit refuses to apply &#8220;look through&#8221; approach to &#167;4 petitions to compel a... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eighth Circuit refuses to apply &ldquo;look through&rdquo; approach to &sect;4 petitions to compel a&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second Circuit allows claim for obesity discrimination under the New York City Human Rights Law. by Rincker Law, PLLC&#8217;s Agriculture Law and Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday Links</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/05/12/second-circuit-allows-claim-for-obesity-discrimination-under-the-new-york-city-human-rights-law/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Rincker Law, PLLC&#8217;s Agriculture Law and Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 11:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/second-circuit-allows-claim-for-obesity-discrimination-under-the-new-york-city-human-rights-law/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an interesting post about an obesity discrimination case under the New York City Human Rights [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an interesting post about an obesity discrimination case under the New York City Human Rights [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arkansas Court of Appeals rejects repair doctrine to toll statute of limitations for construction defects. by Jodie L. Hill</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/03/17/arkansas-court-of-appeals-rejects-repair-doctrine-to-toll-statute-of-limitations-for-construction-defects/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie L. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 05:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/arkansas-court-of-appeals-rejects-repair-doctrine-to-toll-statute-of-limitations-for-construction-defects/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Feel free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arkansas Court of Appeals holds that a bank&#8217;s full, fair, and truthful disclosure of suspicious financial activity to a prosecutor is a defense to malicious prosecution. by Police beat (5/5/10) &#124; Flood Damaged Cars</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/04/29/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-a-banks-full-fair-and-truthful-disclosure-of-suspicious-financial-activity-to-a-prosecutor-is-a-defense-to-malicious-prosecution/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Police beat (5/5/10) &#124; Flood Damaged Cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 07:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/arkansas-court-of-appeals-holds-that-a-banks-full-fair-and-truthful-disclosure-of-suspicious-financial-activity-to-a-prosecutor-is-a-defense-to-malicious-prosecution/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>[...] Arkansas Court &amp;#959f Appeals holds t&amp;#1211&amp;#1072t a bank&#8217;s full, f&amp;#1072&amp;#1110r, &amp;#1072&amp;#1495... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arkansas Court &amp;#959f Appeals holds t&amp;#1211&amp;#1072t a bank&rsquo;s full, f&amp;#1072&amp;#1110r, &amp;#1072&amp;#1495&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arkansas Court of Appeals rejects repair doctrine to toll statute of limitations for construction defects. by Marla Couden</title>
		<link>http://jodielhill.com/2010/03/17/arkansas-court-of-appeals-rejects-repair-doctrine-to-toll-statute-of-limitations-for-construction-defects/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Marla Couden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 06:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downtownlawyer.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/arkansas-court-of-appeals-rejects-repair-doctrine-to-toll-statute-of-limitations-for-construction-defects/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Hello, It&#039;s great to stumble upon a good site like this one. Do you mind if I use some of the information here, and I&#039;ll leave a link back to your site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, It&#8217;s great to stumble upon a good site like this one. Do you mind if I use some of the information here, and I&#8217;ll leave a link back to your site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
